About: Reloading Cost
Calculator
Web Services For free coupons Contact your
Senator
|
Click for Candid
Camera Shots
A
Different Christmas Poem
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
|
|
An account of my trip through customs at the
Canadian border, A letter by Peter J. Streuber It’s Friday afternoon and I am headed to Canada
to spend the long weekend being a part of the holiday scene. It’s the
birthday celebration for Queen Victoria, that was begun around 1876.
Also, it is time for the annual St. Thomas Gun Club, St. Thomas,
Ontario, “Federal Shell Shoot.” My estimated time of arrival at the
Peace Bridge from Buffalo, NY, to Canada will be 2:30P.M. Hopefully,
just in time to beat the South bound rush of after work travelers. I was
wrong, they were already four abreast where possible and with bridge
repair they reached three fourths of a mile back, forming a single line
and coming strong. This is okay with me. I have a good mind set that
says if it takes two and a half to three and an half hours to get across
North bound I will just take it in stride. Maybe I could get some of the
food from the cooler and snack and read while I go through all of the
delays that are talked about when trying to register my shotgun. Also
getting a permit to have one in Canada. It never happened. I drove to
the booth, identified that I had a shotgun and what my purpose was to
the U.S. Border Patrol. They sent me on and when asked by the Canadian
booth attendant about my purpose I answered the same question the same
way. A polite and business manner. I had to get out of line and go to a
parking spot. At this time, my watch was set for the recording of my
delay. One of the customs officers came over to the car and said I will
have to go into the building and fill out the forms. A radio contact by
the booth attendant alerted them to my need. Once inside, the counter attendants tried to help.
They were not sure of the proper forms and paged for help. With a few
instructions and the right forms that were in a drawer under the
counter, the process was over. Wow, how easy they make it for us to pay their
taxes with no representation. As for how much it cost, not the $50 U.S.
money we keep hearing about. I gave the cashier $40 U.S. and she gave me
$6 and change in Canadian money in return. Maybe $36 U.S. Out to the car
back in traffic and only 25 minutes had passed. That was less time than
it used to take me to fill out the old U.S. form on my previous trips. I will close by saying; don’t let a few dollars
and a couple of minutes keep you away from your hunting trip or the
competition of target shooting. Best of Shooting,
|
Submitted by
Anne… Dance Like No One's Watching~
We
convince ourselves that life will be better after we get married,
We
tell ourselves that our life will be complete when our spouse gets his or her
act together, when we get a nicer car, were able to go on a nice vacation, when
we retire. The truth is there's no better time
Your
life will always be filled with challenges. It's best to admit this to yourself
and decide to be happy anyway. One of my favorite quotes comes from Alfred D
Souza. He said, "For a long time it had seemed to me that life was about to
begin-real life. But there was always some obstacle in the way, something to be
gotten through first,
So
stop waiting until you finish school,
until you go back to school,
until you lose ten pounds,
until you gain ten pounds,
until you have kids,
until your kids leave the house,
until you retire,
until you get married,
until you get divorced,
until Friday night,
until you get a new car or home,
until your car or home is paid off,
until spring, until summer,
until fall, until winter,
until you are off welfare,
until the first or fifteenth,
until your song comes on,
until you've had a drink,
until you've sobered up,
until you die, until you are born again to decide that there is no better time
than right now to be happy...
Happiness
is a journey, not a destination. So, Work like you don't need money.
Love like you've never been hurt and… Dance Like no one's watching.
Back
to Top
Lessons from the Geese, submitted by Rob as written by Angeles Arrien...
This Fall, when you see geese heading south for the winter flying along in "V" formation, you might consider what science has discovered as to why they fly that way.

FACT:
As each bird flaps its wings, it creates an "uplift" for the bird
immediately following. By flying in a "V" formation, the whole
flock has at least 71% greater flying range than if each bird flew on it's own.
LESSON: People who share a common direction and sense of community can get where they are going more quickly and easily because they are traveling on the thrust of one another.

FACT:
When a goose flies out of formation, it suddenly feels the drag and resistance
of trying to go it alone. It quickly gets back into formation to take
advantage of the lifting power of the bird in front of it.
LESSON: If we have as much common sense as a goose, we stay in formation with those headed where we want to go. We are willing to accept their help and give our help to others. It is harder to do something alone than together.

FACT:
When the lead goose gets tired, it rotates back into the formation, and another
goose flies to the point position.
LESSON: It is sensible to take turns doing the hard and demanding tasks and sharing leadership. As with geese, people are interdependent of each others skills, capabilities, and unique arrangements of gifts, talents, or resources.

FACT:
The geese flying in formation honk from behind to encourage those up front to
keep up their speed.
LESSON: We need to make sure our honking is encouraging. In groups where there is encouragement, the production is much greater. The power of encouragement (to stand by one's heart or core values and encourage the heart and core of others) is the quality of honking we seek. We need to make sure our honking is encouraging and not discouraging.

FACT:
When a goose gets sick, wounded, or shot down, two other geese will drop out of
formation with that goose and follow it down to lend help and protection.
They stay with the fallen goose until it dies or is able to fly again.
Then, they launch out on their own, or with another formation to catch up with
their flock.
LESSON: If we have the sense of a goose, we will stand by our colleagues and each other in difficult times as well as in good!
The
Pledge of Allegiance
A Short History
by Dr. John W. Baer
Copyright 1992 by Dr. John W. Baer
Francis Bellamy (1855 - 1931), a Baptist minister, wrote the original Pledge in August 1892. He was a Christian Socialist. In his Pledge, he is expressing the ideas of his first cousin, Edward Bellamy, author of the American socialist utopian novels, Looking Backward (1888) and Equality (1897).
Francis Bellamy in his sermons and lectures and Edward Bellamy in his novels and articles described in detail how the middle class could create a planned economy with political, social and economic equality for all. The government would run a peace time economy similar to our present military industrial complex.
The Pledge was published in the September 8th issue of The Youth's Companion, the leading family magazine and the Reader's Digest of its day. Its owner and editor, Daniel Ford, had hired Francis in 1891 as his assistant when Francis was pressured into leaving his baptist church in Boston because of his socialist sermons. As a member of his congregation, Ford had enjoyed Francis's sermons. Ford later founded the liberal and often controversial Ford Hall Forum, located in downtown Boston.
In 1892 Francis Bellamy was also a chairman of a committee of state superintendents of education in the National Education Association. As its chairman, he prepared the program for the public schools' quadricentennial celebration for Columbus Day in 1892. He structured this public school program around a flag raising ceremony and a flag salute - his 'Pledge of Allegiance.'
His original Pledge read as follows: 'I pledge allegiance to my Flag and (to*) the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.' He considered placing the word, 'equality,' in his Pledge, but knew that the state superintendents of education on his committee were against equality for women and African Americans. [ * 'to' added in October, 1892. ]
Dr. Mortimer Adler, American philosopher and last living founder of the Great Books program at Saint John's College, has analyzed these ideas in his book, The Six Great Ideas. He argues that the three great ideas of the American political tradition are 'equality, liberty and justice for all.' 'Justice' mediates between the often conflicting goals of 'liberty' and 'equality.'
In 1923 and 1924 the National Flag Conference, under the 'leadership of the American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the Pledge's words, 'my Flag,' to 'the Flag of the United States of America.' Bellamy disliked this change, but his protest was ignored.
In 1954, Congress after a campaign by the Knights of Columbus, added the words, 'under God,' to the Pledge. The Pledge was now both a patriotic oath and a public prayer.
Bellamy's granddaughter said he also would have resented this second change. He had been pressured into leaving his church in 1891 because of his socialist sermons. In his retirement in Florida, he stopped attending church because he disliked the racial bigotry he found there.
What follows is Bellamy's own account of some of the thoughts that went through his mind in August, 1892, as he picked the words of his Pledge:
It began as an intensive communing with salient points of our national history, from the Declaration of Independence onwards; with the makings of the Constitution...with the meaning of the Civil War; with the aspiration of the people...
The true reason for allegiance to the Flag is the 'republic for which it stands.' ...And what does that vast thing, the Republic mean? It is the concise political word for the Nation - the One Nation which the Civil War was fought to prove. To make that One Nation idea clear, we must specify that it is indivisible, as Webster and Lincoln used to repeat in their great speeches. And its future?
Just here arose the temptation of the historic slogan of the French Revolution which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity.' No, that would be too fanciful, too many thousands of years off in realization. But we as a nation do stand square on the doctrine of liberty and justice for all...
If the Pledge's historical pattern repeats, its words will be modified during this decade. Below are two possible changes.
Some prolife advocates recite the following slightly revised Pledge: 'I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, born and unborn.'
A few liberals recite a slightly revised version of Bellamy's original
Pledge: 'I pledge allegiance to my Flag, and to the Republic for which it
stands, one nation, indivisible, with equality, liberty and justice for
all.' Back
to Top
"It's unwise to pay to much...
But it's worse to pay to little.
When you pay to much, you lose a little money... that is all.
When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything,
because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to
do.
The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a
lot....
It can't be done.
If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you
run.
And if you do that, you will have enough to pay for something better."
John Ruskin 1819-1900 Famous English Writer
Back
to Top
Thomas Sowell
Gun control hypocrisy
ROSIE O'DONNELL is only the latest liberal to be vociferously in favor of gun control for other people -- and yet ready to use firearms for their own protection. Others have included columnist Carl Rowan and Adolph Ochs Sulzberger of the N. Y. Times, whose newspaper has been 200 percent behind gun control laws for years.
Rosie O'Donnell has hired a security guard to protect her young son and the guard has applied for a gun permit. However, children of famous people are by no means the only ones at risk. A recent study showed that a 15-year-old black youth in the inner city has about one chance in 12 of being killed before he reaches the age of 45.
Why is it more important for Rosie O'Donnell's son to have armed protection than for a black youth, or other people living in high-crime neighborhoods, to have armed protection? Here is the same "do as I say, not as I do" hypocrisy found among liberals who want to prevent other people from exercising the same school choice that they exercise for their own children.
There will be no rational discussion of gun control until both sides acknowledge that guns both cost lives and save lives, so that the issue boils down to the net effect. This is a factual question and the facts are readily available, so there is no excuse for this to continue to be discussed in terms of assumptions and theories.
The empirical data are very clear. Where ordinary, law-abiding citizens have been allowed to carry firearms, violent crimes -- including shootings -- have gone down, not up. Where local governments have begun restricting the availability of firearms, including requiring all sorts of "safety" provisions, violent crimes have gone up, even at a time when such crimes are going down nationally.
Obviously, whenever guns are widely available in a country of a quarter of a billion people, somebody somewhere is going to get killed accidentally or by someone whose anger or viciousness gets out of hand. That has to be weighed against the lives that are saved when an armed citizenry reduces violent crime. Taking both these things into account, there has still been a net reduction in violent crime and deaths from allowing law-abiding people ready access to firearms.
This is not a theory. It is what has happened, again and again, in communities all across this country. The facts simply do not fit the gun control advocates' theories.
![]() |
| Purchasing this
book -- linked in 2nd to last paragraph -- helps fund JWR |
More than 90 percent of all uses of guns in self-defense do not involve actually firing the weapon, despite gun control advocates' assumption that we are all such trigger-happy idiots that letting ordinary citizens have guns will lead to bullets flying hither and yon. Like virtually every other liberal crusade, gun control is based on the assumption that other people lack common sense and must be controlled by the superior wisdom and virtue of the anointed.
But both criminals and law-abiding citizens have common sense. An intruder in your home who hears you loading a shotgun in the next room is going to be out of there before you can get to where he is -- and he is very unlikely ever to come back. Muggers or rapists who are ready to attack you on the street are likely to have a sudden change of plans if you pull out a gun.
Every incident where someone opens fire at random in a public place is exploited to the hilt by the media and by gun control advocates. But have you noticed that such shootings occur in places where the potential victims are unlikely to be armed? Restaurants, schools, churches and synagogues are far more likely to be targets than gun shows or conventions of the National Rifle Association. Open fire on people who have firearms themselves and that can be the last dumb thing you do.
The facts are readily available in books like "More Guns, Less Crime" by John Lott or "Pointblank" by Gary Kleck. But gun control advocates do not want to face the facts -- not if it means giving up their vision of the world and their sense of superiority, based on that vision. Not even if it costs other people their lives.
When gun control advocates throw around figures about how many children are killed by guns, they don't tell you that most of these "children" are teenage gangsters, not little kids who find loaded guns around the home.
Joseph Schumpeter once said that the first thing a man will do for his ideals
is lie. Gun control advocates prove his
JWR contributor Thomas
Sowell, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, is author, most recently, of The
Quest for Cosmic Justice.
Back
to Top
WHAT IS REALLY ON AN AMERICAN ONE
DOLLAR BILL…
Take out a one-dollar bill and look at it. The one-dollar bill you're
looking at first came off the presses in 1957 in its present design.
This so-called paper money is in fact a cotton and linen blend, with red
and blue minute silk fibers running through it. It is actually material.
We've all washed it without it falling apart. A special blend of ink is used,
the contents we will never know. It is overprinted with symbols
and then it is starched to make it water resistant and pressed to give
it that nice crisp look.
If you look on the front of the bill, you will see the
United States
Treasury Seal. On the top you will see the scales for a balanced
budget. In the center you have a carpenter's T-square, a tool
used for an even cut. Underneath is the Key to the United States
Treasury. That's all pretty easy to figure out, but what is on the
back of that dollar bill is something we should all know.
If you turn the bill over, you will see two circles. Both circles,
together, comprise the Great Seal of the United States. The First
Continental Congress requested that Benjamin Franklin and a group of
men come up with a Seal. It took them four years to accomplish this task
and another two years to get it approved.
If you look at the left hand circle, you will see a Pyramid. Notice
the face is lighted and the western side is dark. This country was just
beginning. We had not begun to explore the West or decided what we
could do for Western Civilization. The Pyramid is un-capped, again
signifying that we were not even close to being finished. Inside the capstone
you have the all-seeing eye, and ancient symbol for divinity. It was
Franklin’s belief that one man couldn't do it alone, but a group of men,
with the help of God, could do anything. "IN GOD WE TRUST"
is on
this currency. The Latin above the pyramid, ANNUIT COEPTIS, means,
"God
has favored our undertaking." The Latin below the pyramid, NOVUS ORDO
SECLORUM, means "a new order has begun." At the base of the pyramid
is the Roman numeral for 1776.
If you look at the right-hand circle, and check it
carefully, you will
learn that it is on every National Cemetery in the United States. It is
also on the Parade of Flags Walkway at the Bushnell, Florida National
Cemetery and is the centerpiece of most heroes’ monuments. Slightly
modified, it is the seal of the President of the United States and it is
always visible whenever he speaks; yet no one knows what the symbols
mean.
The Bald Eagle was selected as a symbol for victory for two reasons:
first, he is not afraid of a storm; he is strong and he is smart
enough to soar
above it. Secondly, he wears no material crown. We had just broken
from
the King of England. Also, notice the shield is unsupported. This country
can now stand on itâ_™s own. At the top of that shield you have a white
bar signifying congress, a unifying factor. We were coming together as
one nation. In the Eagle's beak you will read, "E PLURIBUS UNUM",
meaning "one nation from many people."
Above the Eagle you have thirteen stars representing the thirteen original
colonies, and any clouds of misunderstanding rolling away. Again, we
were coming together as one. Notice what the Eagle holds in his talons.
He holds an olive branch and arrows. This country wants peace, but we will
never be afraid to fight to preserve peace. The Eagle always wants to
face the olive branch, but in time of war, his gaze turns toward the
arrows.
They say that the number 13 is an unlucky number. This is almost a
worldwide belief. You will usually never see a room numbered 13, or
any hotels or motels with a 13th floor. But, think about this: 13 original
colonies, 13 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 13 stripes on
our flag, 13 steps on the Pyramid, 13 letters in the Latin above, 13
letters in "E Pluribus Unum", 13 stars above the Eagle, 13 plumes of
feathers on each span of the Eagle's wing, 13 bars on that shield, 13
leaves
on the olive branch, 13 fruits, and if you look closely, 13 arrows.
And for minorities: the 13th Amendment.
I always ask people, "Why don't you know this?" Your children
don't
know this and their history teachers don't know this. Too may veterans
have given up too much to ever let the meaning fade? Many veterans
remember coming home to an America that didn't care. Too many
veterans never came home at all.
Tell everyone what is on the back of the one-dollar bill and what it
stands for, because nobody else will.
Back
to Top
Submitted by Dr. Lynn Parsons
|
The History and Art of Shotshells
Photos and text by Jon Farrar
During the early decades of the 1900s, shotshell boxes were graced with lovely typefaces and delightful artwork of game animals and hunting scenes. The invention of gunpowder is attributed to the Chinese, probably before 1000 A.D. By 1250 A.D. it was known in Europe. Gunpowder was reported to have been made in America
Several smokeless powders, also called nitro powders because their base ingredient was a derivative of nitroglycerin, were independently developed in Europe in the mid-1800s, including one by Alfred Nobel, the father of both dynamite and the Nobel Peace Prize. California Powder Works is credited with producing the first smokeless powder in the U.S. in 1893, but its use in sporting ammunition lagged behind military applications. Smokeless powder, unlike black powder, technically does not explode when ignited, but burns rapidly, releasing expanding gases. But gunpowder development was only one step to creating cartridges. First, muzzleloading firearms needed to be replaced by breechloaders. Breechloading rifles existed in the 1830s, and Union soldiers used them during the Civil War, accelerating their development and popularity after the war. Breechloading shotguns did not lag far behind. Before the 1870s, nearly all breechloading shotguns were produced by European gunsmiths and priced beyond the reach of the average American sportsman. Parker Brothers began producing shotguns in the U.S. in 1867 to make use of overstocked rifle parts left in warehouses when the Civil War ended. E. Remington & Sons and Dan Lefever foraged their first breechloading shotguns in the 1870s. Others followed. The development of affordable, American-made breechloaders set in motion an evolution of sporting shotguns. By 1900 the basic designs for shotguns and shotshells were established. Brass Before PaperAll-brass shotshells were manufactured in America at least as early as the mid-1870s and could be ordered empty or loaded. There was much to recommend all-brass shells. Quality-grade shells could be reloaded almost indefinitely. Decades after paper shotshells had
Just as there is no definitive answer as to who made the first breechloading shotgun, the first maker of paper shotshells with brass bases has long been debated. The C.D. Leet Company of Springfield, Massachusetts, is often credited with making the first paper-hull shotshells, perhaps in the early 1860s and certainly by 1869, when it obtained a patent. Paper-hull shotshells developed almost concurrently with all-brass shotshells, but the availability and popularity of factory-loaded paper shotshells lagged behind. During the 1870s and into the 1900s, sporting publications were filled with powder company advertisements, evidence of the continued use of muzzleloading firearms and that most sportsmen were hand-loading their own brass or paper shotshells. Initially, manufacturers sold primed but unloaded paper shells in boxes of 100. Sporting goods stores and gunsmiths often loaded shotshells for general sale or as special orders. Such boxes usually bore the seller's distinct label, and because they were produced in relatively small quantities are rare finds for today's collector. Two Nebraska examples are shotshells marketed by the Paxton & Gallagher Company and the Townsend Gun Company, both of Omaha. Such outlets introduced sportsmen to "store-bought shotgun shells." The first machine-loaded shotshells are generally attributed to Frank Chamberlin of Cleveland, Ohio. In 1883 Chamberlin hosted J. Palmer O'Neil, president of the Pittsburgh Firearms Company, on a duck hunt. After dinner and over cigars, so the story was related in a 1908 Field and Stream article, Chamberlin said he had "built a machine that will load and crimp four hundred shells an hour." Chamberlin had one of his iron, brass and wood machines clamped to a table in a room where his shooting paraphernalia was housed and demonstrated its operation to O'Neil. Field and Stream reported, "As a demonstration Mr. Chamberlin loaded fifty shells so speedily that his guest was astounded." Chamberlin later speculated on the thoughts passing through the industrialist's mind: "He saw before him a complete machine for loading shotgun cartridges, capable of operation by hand or power, and embodying devices for handling powder and shot in any desired charges, seating any number of wads up to four, crimping the shells and delivering them ready for use." In 1884, Chamberlin patented his automatic loading machine and with O'Neil founded the Chamberlin Cartridge Company in Cleveland. An improved machine capable of loading 1,200 to 1,500 shotshells an hour was built at the cost of about $1,500. Chamberlin's machine was also sold to sporting goods houses that produced loads under their own name. Chamberlin's loaded shotshells swept the country, embraced by shooters who did not want the fuss of hand-loading or who saw the advantage of uniformly loaded shotshells. Sandy Griswold, the Omaha Bee's sporting editor, unabashedly endorsed them in an 1894 column, calling them "the best loaded shells in the country." As nitro powders came into common use in the late 1890s, uniformly loaded shotshells became even more desirable because improperly loaded nitro loads were dangerous in shotguns with weaker Damascus barrels. Other ammunition manufacturers could not ignore Chamberlin's popular shotshells at easy-on-the-pocketbook prices. Winchester marketed loaded shotshells perhaps as early as 1887 and Union Metallic Cartridge Company by 1890. Paper shotshells were quickly embraced by upland shooters, but waterfowlers clung to brass hulls that did not swell when wet, a problem eventually addressed with waxed and lacquered paper shells. Chamberlin's success was also his undoing. He competed directly with two large ammunition manufacturers who supplied his company with unloaded shells and wads. Both soon suspended sales to Chamberlin. The only other sources for shotshell components were in Europe and tariff fees were prohibitive. By 1900, the Chamberlin Cartridge & Target Company was essentially out of the ammunition business. The company then concentrated on manufacturing mechanical traps and clay targets for the burgeoning interest in trapshooting. Remington Arms bought the Chamberlin business in 1933. While Frank Chamberlin's time in the ammunition business was brief, he left indelible footprints on the industry. Chamberlin and O'Neil introduced packaging 25 shotshells to the box. Before that time nearly all shotshells were sold unloaded in a pasteboard box accommodating 100. Several ammunition manufacturers produced ornately designed 100-shell boxes that came to be called "Christmas boxes" and were sold as gifts for the sportsman. Loaded shotshells, though, were heavy. The 100-shell boxes were prone to rupture, and retailers
From the 1880s into the early 1900s, numerous brands of loaded and unloaded paper shotshells appeared on the American market. Some were manufactured and sold by major ammunition manufacturers, and many others by smaller companies that purchased components from suppliers and loaded their own. That period is a rich hunting ground for today's shotshell box collectors because many of the small company brands were short-lived and their cartridges were produced in small quantities. Early-day shotshell makers that bring a glimmer of recognition to serious collectors include Austin Cartridge Company, Blatchford Cartridge Works, California Powder Works, Clinton Cartridge Company, American Buckle and Cartridge Company, Selby Smelting and Lead Company, International Cartridge Company, Standard Cartridge Company and dozens of others that had their time and vanished as large ammunition manufacturers crowded them out of the market or swallowed them up. One of the largest consumers of competition was DuPont, until stymied temporarily in 1912 by antitrust action. Some small makers of shotshells fought a good fight against the conglomerates. The Robin Hood Ammunition Company of Swanton, Vermont, for example, prominently displayed the words "Not Made by a Trust" in its advertising. The company's hope that American sportsmen would side with an underdog proved in vain. The Robin Hood Powder Company incorporated in 1898 and changed its name to the Robin Hood Ammunition Company in 1906. Robin Hood was sold to Remington in 1915. Shotshells were produced under the Robin Hood name until 1919. By 1900, loaded paper shells were obviously the product of the future. Between 1887 and 1901 shotshell sales increased seven-fold. Six large American ammunition manufactures emerged from the fray in the early 1900s: Union Metallic Cartridge Company, Peters Cartridge Company, Remington Arms Company, Western Cartridge Company, Winchester Repeating Arms Company and United States Cartridge Company. There remain many unknown details in the history of shotshells, and disagreement on dates and events. The records of most early manufacturers vanished years ago, some in fires, some discarded as smaller companies were absorbed into larger companies. It is clear, though, that the history of powder and ammunition companies in the U.S. is one of corporate cannibalism, of large companies swallowing up smaller companies that produced components they needed or were in competition with them. Union Metallic Cartridge CompanyIn 1854, Jacob Schuyler, Marcellus Hartley and Malcomb Graham formed the Schuyler, Hartley & Graham Sporting Goods Company in New York City. Destined to become one of the largest sporting goods houses in the world, it provided cartridges and rifles produced by
UMC was probably the first U.S. company to produce and market all-brass shotshells in about 1868. In 1873, UMC acquired the patent rights to the C.D. Leet Company's paper shotshells and began manufacturing primed but unloaded paper shotshells in 10- and 12-gauge loads. Unloaded eight-, 14-, 16- and 20-gauge shells were added to the line in 1880, and four-gauge in 1883. UMC was probably the first American firm to manufacture paper shotshells in quantity. Some loaded shotshells might have been produced during this period but not on a commercial scale. UMC marketed its first factory-loaded Club shotshells in 1888. From 1891 through 1905, UMC added other lines of shotshells including New Club, Nitro, Smokeless, Lightning, Black-Club, Arrow, Nitro Club, Monarch, Majestic, Acme, Challenge, Expert, High Base, Magic and Primrose Club. Many lines of shotshells were sold both loaded and unloaded. In 1888, UMC and Winchester purchased the E. Remington & Son's Gun Company. Remington cartridge lines continued under Remington's name. UMC bought Winchester's interest in Remington in 1896, and the merger of UMC and Remington was completed in 1911 under the name
The Peters Cartridge Company was founded in 1887 by brothers Gershom and O.E. Peters and other investors. Gershom was the son-in-law of J.W. King, founder of the King Powder
Peters claimed to be the first company to market "automatic machine-loaded shotshells," even though the company was founded three years after Chamberlin patented his shotshell-loading machine. In fact, Peters took Chamberlin's idea and made it better, bigger and faster. Unlike Chamberlin's invention, the Peters's machine was powered by a steam engine and did not require an individual to place components in the empty shell by hand. The Peters's autoloader, maintained by three workers, could produce 60 shotshells per minute, hour after hour, day after day. Because of reduced labor costs and volume production, Peters shotshells were immediately competitive on the market. Like Chamberlin, Peters initially purchased its paper shells from UMC, Winchester or U.S. Cartridge. When Peters moved to purchase the American Buckle and Cartridge Company of New Haven, Connecticut, in 1889, a manufacturer of unloaded shotshells, Winchester intervened and purchased the company. While Winchester acquired American Buckle and Cartridge Company, its machinery to manufacture unloaded cartridges was subsequently sold to Peters. By 1891, Peters was manufacturing its own paper shells under the trade name Prize. Winchester sued, but by the time the lawsuit was settled the patent had expired. In 1895, Peters built its first shot tower to produce lead pellets, and soon was producing its own primers and wads. Because of its association with King Powder Company, a variety of gunpowders were assured. Peters had become a self-contained company independent of suppliers of shotshell components. By 1895 Peters was also manufacturing and selling loaded
By the mid-1890s, Peters was selling cartridges loaded with black powder, smokeless powder and semismokeless powder, all produced by the King Powder Company located just across the Little Miami River from the Peters's factory at Kings Mills, Ohio, north of Cincinnati. Semismokeless powder, introduced by King in 1897, was a combination of smokeless and black powders. It was claimed to have the best qualities of both powders - the high velocity of a nitro powder with the low breech pressure of a black powder. King's semismokeless powder was nearly smokeless, did not foul firearms and was less susceptible to deterioration in storage than smokeless powders of the time. Peters discontinued using King's semismokeless powder in the mid-1930s, and the DuPont's superior Lesmok smokeless powder claimed the lion's share of the smokeless powder market. Peters's shotshells were the darling of shooters in the early 1900s, and many of its loads were legendary. Peters's League line was billed as a "capital shell for all ordinary purposes, strong and a sure killer." Referee shotshells were loaded with semismokeless powder and offered "a velocity equaling the best nitro powders, with low breech pressure" and could be purchased for slightly more than black powder shotshells. Ideal shotshells, with high brass and a cherry-colored paper, could be ordered loaded with all makes of smokeless powders. Victor shotshells had a medium-height brass, brown paper and were loaded with smokeless powder. Premier shotshells with high brass and blue paper were loaded with dense smokeless powder and were premium loads. High Gun shotshells, with medium-height brass and bright blue paper, loaded with dense smokeless powder were advertised as "medium price but high in quality." Shotshells in some of Peters's lines, as well as those of other manufacturers, were often made in more than one paper color over time. During the early 1900s, Peters's shotshells swept national trapshooting competitions and they were hailed by shooting editors. "The Peters Cartridge and Shotgun Ammunition company at Cincinnati, O., is building up a world-wide reputation for the superiority of their shells, and the perfect way in which they are loaded," wrote Griswold wrote 1894. "Their Quick shot shell is matchless, especially so when loaded at their factory. They have the largest establishment in the United States and are doing the bulk of the business in the line of loaded shells." Griswold repeatedly praised Peters shotshells, perhaps because they were arguably the best on the market or perhaps because of the influence of field representatives who made regular calls on underpaid sportswriters with a complimentary case of Peters's Victor or Ideal shotshells before each hunting season. Peters excelled at promoting its products in the early 1900s. Peters's advertising art appealed to shooters, especially the early Quickshot Christmas box showing nattily clad hunters shooting birds over their pointing dogs. Peters published booklets with information for shooters including game laws, lusciously illustrated calendars and magazine advertising. Peters was prominent at national trapshoots and trade shows and over the years sponsored a number of exhibition or trick shooters who traveled the country, among them A.H. Hardy, a Hyannis, Nebraska, native. World War I was an enormous boom for all firearm and ammunition manufacturers. Even before the U.S. entered the war, Peters supplied metal cartridges to the British and Russians. Peters modernized and expanded its factories, and soldiers guarded them around-the-clock for fear of sabotage. But Peters was also one of many victims of the Depression in the late 1920s and 1930s. Military contracts dried up and sportsmen tightened their belts. Peters spent heavily in the early 1930s developing improved cartridges, but the market did not reward the investment. Peters's plant slowed to three days a week. In the spring of 1934, all assets of the Peters Cartridge Company were sold to Remington Arms owned by DuPont, one of the nation's earliest and largest powder manufacturers. The Peters's factory at Kings Mills was closed by Remington in 1944. Remington continued marketing the popular lines of Peters shotshells - High Velocity, Target Load and Victor field loads - into the 1960s. Remington Arms CompanyRemington Arms is said to have had its beginning in 1816 when 23-year-old Eliphalet Remington II built his own flintlock rifle on his father's forge in Ilion Gulch, New York. By the 1840s, E. Remington & Sons was building breechloading carbines for the U.S. government. In 1850 Remington developed machines to drill close-tolerance holes in steel blanks to manufacture barrels for rifles and shotguns, and was producing handguns. During the Civil War, Remington factories produced 40,000 rifles for the Union Army. Remington subcontracted the manufacture of metallic cartridges during the Civil War, but in 1871 began to manufacture its own and made brass shotshells as early as 1874. Because of war contracts and sales of firearms to other countries, Remington expanded its operations rapidly. Sales plummeted after the Civil War and Remington diversified into peacetime products - sewing machines, typewriters, agricultural machinery and sporting firearms. Remington began marketing double-barreled shotguns in 1873. Still, the company teetered on the verge of bankruptcy. In 1885, the cartridge works was lost in a fire. The following year Remington went into receivership managed by a board of trustees. In 1888, UMC and Winchester purchased the E. Remington & Sons Gun Company. It continued to operate independently and its name was shortened to the Remington Arms Company. The manufacture of firearms remained Remington's leading business, although its line of cartridges were sold widely. Cartridges were the principal business of the company's UMC division. The names of the two companies were merged in 1911 to become the
Remington expanded its operations in the mid-1910s, an investment that paid off in lucrative government contracts for arms and ammunition when the U.S. entered World War I. Part of Remington's expansion was the purchase of the Robin Hood Ammunition Company in 1915. In 1920, the company's name was changed to Remington Arms Company Inc., but the combined name REM-UMC headstamp was used at least into the 1950s. During the 1920s, Remington began distributing and selling decorative patches with the company logo, expanded into the clothing and accessory business (discontinued in 1995), and registered a number of patents used to identify its ammunition - Wetproof, Hi-Speed, Express, Economy, Nitro Express, Arrow Express, Keanbore, Rustproof and Shur Shot. Remington's famous Kleanbore line of shotshells was introduced in 1926. In the Depression, Remington again flirted with financial failure. In 1933 DuPont took control of Remington and its sunburst logo was dropped from cartridge boxes and advertising. Also in 1933, the new company acquired the Chamberlin Cartridge & Target Company (subsequently renamed the Chamberlin Target & Trap Works) for $66,000. In 1934 DuPont-Remington purchased the Peters Cartridge Company for about $2.5 million and the Parker Gun Company. In 1980 DuPont purchased the remaining shares of stock of Remington and the company became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Remington was the first American ammunition manufacturer to introduce shotshells with plastic hulls in 1960. For years, ammunition manufacturers had looked for a material to replace paper hulls. They experimented with aluminum and synthetic materials that were tougher, would not swell when wet, were less expensive and required fewer manufacturing steps. The production of paper shotshells was said to require more than a hundred separate operations. Dutch-made, all-plastic shotshells had been on the market, and functioned well enough except in semiautomatic shotguns. Remington's polyethylene hulls were prestressed by a "secret process to make them tougher than whang leather." The company claimed they could be soaked in water for a week or more and still fire properly. Furthermore, they could be reloaded many more times than paper-hull shotshells. In 1961, another year-marker appeared on all shotshell boxes manufactured and sold in the U.S. It was the warning "Keep Out of Reach of Children." Remington's most visually interesting and collectible line of shotshell boxes was the Nitro Club game-load series sold from 1922 through 1934. Harkening back to Chamberlin's similar series before 1900, 11 different shotshell loads were developed for specific game animals and the box of each adorned with artwork of that species, or of a species representing a group, such as Dove Load, Duck Load, Grouse Load, Rabbit Load, Squirrel Load and Snipe Load. The rarest of the series is the Brant Load, made only in 1922, a box in good condition today fetching several thousa |